Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libvirt pool path is wrong when it is not default #108

Closed
Jooho opened this issue Jan 12, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

libvirt pool path is wrong when it is not default #108

Jooho opened this issue Jan 12, 2019 · 6 comments
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@Jooho
Copy link

Jooho commented Jan 12, 2019

Even though I use custom path for storagePool(/home/jooho/KVM), the actuator try to use wrong path.

E0112 03:54:03.202553       1 actuator.go:107] Machine error: error creating volume Can't retrieve volume /var/lib/libvirt/images/tbd-base
E0112 03:54:03.203245       1 actuator.go:51] tbd/tbd-worker-0-nhzvf: error creating libvirt machine: error creating volume Can't retrieve volume /var/lib/libvirt/images/tbd-base
E0112 03:54:04.259706       1 actuator.go:107] Machine error: error creating volume Can't retrieve volume /var/lib/libvirt/images/tbd-base
E0112 03:54:04.259734       1 actuator.go:51] tbd/tbd-worker-0-d554w: error creating libvirt machine: error creating volume Can't retrieve volume /var/lib/libvirt/images/tbd-base

The worker storage files are generated under /home/jooho/KVM but it failed to retrieve the files because it tried to load them under /var/lib/libvirt/images.

Expected result

it should search right path where the image files are generated.

@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Jan 12, 2019

#45 should fix this.

@cfergeau
Copy link
Contributor

#45 was superseded by #144 which is merged, so hopefully this no longer is an issue?

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 14, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Nov 13, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants