Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CCO-320: Add support for Azure workload identity tokens #274

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 21, 2023

Conversation

dlom
Copy link

@dlom dlom commented Apr 24, 2023

xref: CCO-320

Base commit: 5f39919 (taken from upstream kubernetes-sigs#3583)

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Apr 24, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 24, 2023

@dlom: This pull request references CCO-320 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

xref: CCO-320

Base commit: 5478be4 (taken from upstream kubernetes-sigs#2924)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 24, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 24, 2023

@dlom: This pull request references CCO-320 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

xref: CCO-320

Base commit: 5478be4 (taken from upstream kubernetes-sigs#2924)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from elmiko and JoelSpeed April 24, 2023 18:56
@JoelSpeed
Copy link

Looks like the upstream PR is being worked on actively, is it possible to wait/help on that issue so that it's merged and then we can pick it down and drop it on the next rebase?

CC @RadekManak there's no git history check on this repository, could you look at adding it?

@JoelSpeed
Copy link

@dlom This didn't get picked up in the rebase, can you update the PR and use the UPSTREAM: ####: commit prefix format and we can merge this and then drop it in the next rebase

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 19, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 20, 2023
@dlom dlom changed the title [WIP] CCO-320: Add support for Azure workload identity tokens CCO-320: Add support for Azure workload identity tokens Jul 20, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 20, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 20, 2023

@dlom: This pull request references CCO-320 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

xref: CCO-320

Base commit: 5f39919 (taken from upstream kubernetes-sigs#3583)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dlom
Copy link
Author

dlom commented Jul 20, 2023

@JoelSpeed did I do it right?

@dlom
Copy link
Author

dlom commented Jul 20, 2023

@elmiko does this look right?

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 20, 2023

@dlom: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azure-techpreview f38fa97 link false /test e2e-azure-techpreview

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 21, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 21, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 21, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c015df4 into openshift:master Jul 21, 2023
damdo added a commit to damdo/cluster-capi-operator that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2023
when the carry patch openshift/cluster-api-provider-azure#274
was merged, `make assets` wasn't rerun on the cluster-capi-operator.
To fix this we need to rerun asset generation and check in the changes
showing up.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants