-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8346965: Multiple compiler/ciReplay test fails with -XX:+SegmentedCodeCache #22926
Conversation
👋 Welcome back syan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@sendaoYan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 11 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@sendaoYan The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Also, as the failing tests are 4, it might be a good idea to update the title. |
Okay, the title has been updated. |
/issue JDK-8346965 |
@sendaoYan This issue is referenced in the PR title - it will now be updated. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
GHA report 1 failure:
|
Thanks all for the advice and review. /integrate |
Going to push as commit cf3e48e.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@sendaoYan Pushed as commit cf3e48e. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi all,
There are 4 tests fails run with JVM option '-XX:+SegmentedCodeCache'. JVM option '-XX:ReservedCodeCacheSize=4m' inside test conflict with JVM option '-XX:+SegmentedCodeCache' which pass from outside test. This PR add '-XX:-SegmentedCodeCache' explicitly inside test to make test run success whenever received '-XX:+SegmentedCodeCache' outside or not. Change has been verified locally, test-fix only, make test more robustness, no risk.
'SegmentedCodeCache' is enable by default
Pass '-XX:ReservedCodeCacheSize=4m' to JVM will automatic disable
SegmentedCodeCache
'-XX:+SegmentedCodeCache' conflict with '-XX:ReservedCodeCacheSize=4m'
> java -XX:ReservedCodeCacheSize=4m -XX:+SegmentedCodeCache -version Error occurred during initialization of VM Invalid code heap sizes: NonNMethodCodeHeapSize (8006K) + ProfiledCodeHeapSize (4K) + NonProfiledCodeHeapSize (4K) = 8014K is greater than ReservedCodeCacheSize (4096K).
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22926/head:pull/22926
$ git checkout pull/22926
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22926
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22926/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22926
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22926
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22926.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment