Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8346457: AOT cache creation crashes with "assert(pair_at(i).match() < pair_at(i+1).match()) failed: unsorted table entries" #22871

Closed

Conversation

calvinccheung
Copy link
Member

@calvinccheung calvinccheung commented Dec 23, 2024

Avoid calling InstanceKlass::compute_has_loops_flag_for_methods() when a class has failed verification during CDS dump. It is to avoid assert in subsequent byte code verification such as in Bytecode_lookupswitch::verify().

Testing: tiers 1 - 4.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8346457: AOT cache creation crashes with "assert(pair_at(i).match() < pair_at(i+1).match()) failed: unsorted table entries" (Bug - P2)(⚠️ The fixVersion in this issue is [24] but the fixVersion in .jcheck/conf is 25, a new backport will be created when this pr is integrated.)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22871/head:pull/22871
$ git checkout pull/22871

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22871
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22871/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22871

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22871

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22871.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

… pair_at(i+1).match()) failed: unsorted table entries"
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 23, 2024

👋 Welcome back ccheung! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 23, 2024

@calvinccheung This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8346457: AOT cache creation crashes with "assert(pair_at(i).match() < pair_at(i+1).match()) failed: unsorted table entries"

Reviewed-by: iklam, dholmes

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 28 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 9393897: 8346260: Test "javax/swing/JOptionPane/bug4174551.java" failed because the font size of message "Hi 24" is not set to 24 in Nimbus LookAndFeel
  • e98f412: 8346922: TestVectorReinterpret.java fails without the rvv extension on RISCV fastdebug VM
  • ca5390c: 8346924: TestVectorizationNegativeScale.java fails without the rvv extension on RISCV fastdebug VM
  • 07c9f71: 8346921: Remove unused arg in markWord::must_be_preserved
  • 84e6432: 8346288: WB_IsIntrinsicAvailable fails if called with wrong compilation level
  • a77ed30: 8336412: sun.net.www.MimeTable has a few unused methods
  • e769b53: 8346193: CrashGCForDumpingJavaThread do not trigger expected crash build with clang17
  • a87bc7e: 8345374: Ubsan: runtime error: division by zero
  • d3abf01: 8346101: [JVMCI] Export jdk.internal.misc to jdk.graal.compiler
  • 24c5ff7: 8346871: Improve robustness of java/util/zip/EntryCount64k.java test
  • ... and 18 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/b8e40b9c2dfecdad9096015c1aa208ea077db7f5...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 23, 2024

@calvinccheung The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@calvinccheung calvinccheung marked this pull request as ready for review January 3, 2025 00:34
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 3, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 3, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@iklam iklam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 3, 2025
Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems quite reasonable.

Thanks

@calvinccheung
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @iklam, @dholmes-ora for the review.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Going to push as commit 8d388cc.
Since your change was applied there have been 39 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 6, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 6, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 6, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 6, 2025

@calvinccheung Pushed as commit 8d388cc.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@calvinccheung calvinccheung deleted the 8346457-aot-cache-jck branch January 6, 2025 19:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-runtime [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants