Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[liquidcheck] Initial contribution #13287

Merged
merged 36 commits into from
May 13, 2023
Merged

Conversation

marcelGoerentz
Copy link
Contributor

@marcelGoerentz marcelGoerentz commented Aug 18, 2022

Signed-off-by: Marcel Goerentz [email protected]

[liquidcheck] Initial contribution

Description

Adding a new binding so users can connect openHAB to Liquid-Check devices.
This binding integrates the sensor to the users home automation with little configuration effort.

Testing

Binding has been tested with hardware version B and firmware version 1.60 of the device.

@marcelGoerentz marcelGoerentz requested a review from a team as a code owner August 18, 2022 13:16
@marcelGoerentz marcelGoerentz changed the title Add new binding liquidcheck [liquidcheck] Initial contribution Aug 18, 2022
@jlaur jlaur added the new binding If someone has started to work on a binding. For a new binding PR. label Aug 20, 2022
@marcelGoerentz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey guys,

I'm just curious if someone is reviewing my binding.
I'm looking forward to your comments.

@jlaur
Copy link
Contributor

jlaur commented Sep 6, 2022

I'm just curious if someone is reviewing my binding.

Hi @marcelGoerentz, thanks for your contribution. Just wanted to let you know that we currently have a lot of PR's to review (including other new bindings as well), so please expect some additional time until a maintainer will be able to perform a full review. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Copy link
Contributor

@lolodomo lolodomo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review part 1 of 3

@marcelGoerentz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @lolodomo,

thank you for your review. I appreciate it very much.
I've adjusted most of the points that you mentioned.

Copy link
Contributor

@jlaur jlaur left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lolodomo beat me in finding proper amount of time to go through your PR. 😄 So I will just post old minor comments from some time ago when I was having a brief look.

@lolodomo
Copy link
Contributor

@lolodomo - would you like to finish your review?

Feel free to finish the review and merge without waiting for me.

@jlaur
Copy link
Contributor

jlaur commented Mar 26, 2023

@lolodomo - would you like to finish your review?

Feel free to finish the review and merge without waiting for me.

I have not fully reviewed, because I saw you already did. Just wanted to check if there was still something pending from your side preventing a merge, because review comments seemed to have been addressed.

@jlaur
Copy link
Contributor

jlaur commented Mar 28, 2023

@lolodomo - would you like to finish your review?

Feel free to finish the review and merge without waiting for me.

I have not fully reviewed, because I saw you already did. Just wanted to check if there was still something pending from your side preventing a merge, because review comments seemed to have been addressed.

@lolodomo - gentle ping. If your review is concluded, please approve. The few comments from my side are resolved, but as said, I haven't reviewed, so would appreciate your confirmation.

Copy link
Contributor

@jlaur jlaur left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm trusting @lolodomo already reviewed this PR. Let's get it finished and merged. I have just a few additional comments after going through changed files.

Copy link
Contributor

@jlaur jlaur left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Almost there. 🙂

Copy link
Contributor

@jlaur jlaur left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, this fell off my radar. I checked the last two commits and provided two additional comments.

@jlaur jlaur added rebuild Triggers Jenkins PR build and removed rebuild Triggers Jenkins PR build labels May 13, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@jlaur jlaur left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your contribution and your patience. Let's merge this binding and hopefully get it more widely tested with the next milestone release. If any issues are later found leading to an explanation why you needed to start the shared http client, this can be fixed in a follow-up PR.

Now, you could add your binding's logo to the openHAB website. See https://www.openhab.org/docs/developer/bindings/#add-your-binding-s-logo-to-the-openhab-website

@jlaur jlaur merged commit ab16c94 into openhab:main May 13, 2023
@jlaur jlaur added this to the 4.0 milestone May 13, 2023
tb4jc pushed a commit to tb4jc/openhab-addons that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2023
* Add new binding liquidcheck

Signed-off-by: Marcel Goerentz <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Burri <[email protected]>
matchews pushed a commit to matchews/openhab-addons that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2023
* Add new binding liquidcheck

Signed-off-by: Marcel Goerentz <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matt Myers <[email protected]>
austvik pushed a commit to austvik/openhab-addons that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2024
* Add new binding liquidcheck

Signed-off-by: Marcel Goerentz <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jørgen Austvik <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
new binding If someone has started to work on a binding. For a new binding PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants