fix: use a single 'provider_type' key for storing discussion provider type in course

[xitij2000]

Description

Both 'provider' and 'provider_type' have been used for storing the discussion provider type in course 'discussions_settings' field, there are some places in the code checking for 'provider' and others checking for 'provider_type', in some cases this can cause a bug where it doesn't detect the correct provider which causes discussion settings not being copied correctly when a course is cloned.

This change prioritises the provider_type setting over provider and reads provider only as a fallback. The provider setting is now made read-only just for backwards-compatibility, to avoid confusion.

Testing instructions

• Create a course structure with discussions enable or disabled in different sections. You can use this test course.
• Use the course clone API to clone the course: studio.local.openedx.io:8001/api/v1/course_runs/clone/
• Check that the discussion enabled/disabled statues is copied over.

Deadline

None

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @xitij2000!

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/wg-maintenance-edx-platform.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

• If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
  • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
• If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

• Dependencies

  This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

• Blockers

  This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

• Timeline information

  This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

• Partner information

  This is for a course on edx.org.

• Supporting documentation
• Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

---

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

• Overview of Review Process for Community Contributions
• Pull Request Status Guide
• Making changes to your pull request

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

• The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
• The need for product review
• Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

[0x29a]

👍

• I tested this: tried cloning a course with different discussion settings and ensured that they're preserved.
• I read through the code.