-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 110
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rebuild refactoring #1581
Merged
Merged
Rebuild refactoring #1581
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
tiagolobocastro
commented
Jan 19, 2024
bors try |
tryBuild succeeded: |
hrudaya21
approved these changes
Jan 23, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm.
We can have the entity relation diagram for bdev and nexus rebuild abstraction in LLD for future reference.
dsharma-dc
reviewed
Jan 25, 2024
tiagolobocastro
commented
Jan 25, 2024
dsharma-dc
approved these changes
Jan 29, 2024
Signed-off-by: Tiago Castro <[email protected]>
A rebuild is essentially a copy from one bdev to another. However, we can have different variations on this. This change aims to make the rebuild more generic, removing the nexus specific bits from the core rebuild logic and allowing us to compose different types of rebuild in the future, whilst being able to reuse the shared bits. To achieve this the rebuild backend is split into a rebuild manager which is the generic component responsible for running and managing the rebuild and its tasks. We can then implement different rebuild backends as we see fit, example a nexus rebuild which locks ranges or a regular bdev to bdev rebuild. Signed-off-by: Tiago Castro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tiago Castro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tiago Castro <[email protected]>
94ad6ce
to
dc53c12
Compare
bors merge |
bors-openebs-mayastor bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2024
1581: Rebuild refactoring r=tiagolobocastro a=tiagolobocastro refactor(rebuild): make the rebuild more generic A rebuild is essentially a copy from one bdev to another. However, we can have different variations on this. This change aims to make the rebuild more generic, removing the nexus specific bits from the core rebuild logic and allowing us to compose different types of rebuild in the future, whilst being able to reuse the shared bits. To achieve this the rebuild backend is split into a rebuild manager which is the generic component responsible for running and managing the rebuild and its tasks. We can then implement different rebuild backends as we see fit, example a nexus rebuild which locks ranges or a regular bdev to bdev rebuild. Signed-off-by: Tiago Castro <[email protected]> --- fix(rebuild): send final rebuild state on drop Signed-off-by: Tiago Castro <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tiago Castro <[email protected]>
Had forgotten to resolve comment :( |
Build succeeded: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.