created ilab form

[rsun19]

RHOAIENG-19020

Description

Added the instruct lab form with some zod methods.

The base URL is /modelCustomization/instructlab/<project-name>

How Has This Been Tested?

Added test files. You can also test visually.

Test Impact

Added tests.

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit or cypress tests for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

• [ x Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
• Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change.

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

• The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

[rsun19]

I experienced these errors when trying to call api.listPipelines({}) and api.listPipelineVersions({}, pipeline.pipeline_id,), can someone look into them? The first two error messages are related to the former, and the last one refers to the latter. Everything works, but these errors appear for some reason.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 64.48598% with 38 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.32%. Comparing base (8c2a737) to head (7b722d9).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...rm/modelCustomizationFormSchema/validationUtils.ts	25.00%	24 Missing ⚠️
...s/global/modelCustomization/FineTunePageFooter.tsx	45.45%	6 Missing ⚠️
...obal/modelCustomization/ModelCustomizationForm.tsx	78.57%	3 Missing ⚠️
.../content/modelCustomizationForm/useIlabPipeline.ts	86.66%	2 Missing ⚠️
...c/concepts/pipelines/apiHooks/usePipelineByName.ts	88.88%	1 Missing ⚠️
...ages/pipelines/global/GlobalPipelineCoreLoader.tsx	80.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...end/src/routes/pipelines/modelCustomizationForm.ts	75.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (64.48%) is below the target coverage (70.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3756      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.35%   84.32%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files        1485     1496      +11     
  Lines       34063    34183     +120     
  Branches     9437     9470      +33     
==========================================
+ Hits        28733    28824      +91     
- Misses       5330     5359      +29     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
frontend/src/api/pipelines/custom.ts	95.83% <100.00%> (+0.08%)	⬆️
frontend/src/components/EmptyStateErrorMessage.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (+85.71%)	⬆️
...mizationForm/modelCustomizationFormSchema/types.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
.../concepts/pipelines/context/usePipelineAPIState.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...pages/pipelines/GlobalModelCustomizationRoutes.tsx	100.00% <ø> (ø)
.../pages/pipelines/global/PipelineCoreNoProjects.tsx	100.00% <ø> (+75.00%)	⬆️
...pelines/global/modelCustomization/FineTunePage.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...pages/pipelines/global/modelCustomization/const.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...c/concepts/pipelines/apiHooks/usePipelineByName.ts	88.88% <88.88%> (ø)
...ages/pipelines/global/GlobalPipelineCoreLoader.tsx	90.00% <80.00%> (+21.25%)	⬆️
... and 5 more

... and 9 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8c2a737...7b722d9. Read the comment docs.

[Gkrumbach07]

looks great just one small request (☞ຈل͜ຈ)☞

[rsun19]

I made it so /modelCustomization/instructlab/ links to 404

[rsun19]

everything should be good now

[DaoDaoNoCode]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: DaoDaoNoCode
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from gkrumbach07. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• frontend/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment