moving android to the registry attributes

[mlunadia]

moving android to the registry attributes

[trisch-me]

lgtm

[jsuereth]

Looks good pending, @AlexanderWert's suggestion on the registry markdown.

[AlexanderWert]

There's an additional Android attribute in here: https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions/blob/main/model/logs/mobile-events.yaml

Should we move that (and maybe also the iOS one) as part of this PR as well?

EDIT: Actually that would be yet another case being blocked on open-telemetry/build-tools#242, because we would mix resource with semantic attributes.

[mlunadia]

There's an additional Android attribute in here: https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions/blob/main/model/logs/mobile-events.yaml

Should we move that (and maybe also the iOS one) as part of this PR as well?

EDIT: Actually that would be yet another case being blocked on open-telemetry/build-tools#242, because we would mix resource with semantic attributes.

@AlexanderWert should we go ahead and merge the PR as it is today to progress on the attributes that are not blocked?

[github-actions]

This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days.

[breedx-splk]

@mlunadia Looks like this needs a rebase. Also commenting to keep this open because I think we're close?

[trisch-me]

@mlunadia could you please update this PR with fields @AlexanderWert mentioned above and change the type to be generic attribute_group.

[github-actions]

This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days.

[ChrsMark]

@open-telemetry/specs-semconv-approvers do we need a changelog for this or we can label with "Skip Changelog"?

[trisch-me]

@ChrsMark yes, we don't need a changelog entry for refactoring, I have added a label

[ChrsMark]

@ChrsMark yes, we don't need a changelog entry for refactoring, I have added a label

Cool, then I guess this is good to go? Do not see anything else pending here 🤔