-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 897
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Small clarification for default's service.name for exporters. #1386
Small clarification for default's service.name for exporters. #1386
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: "was specified" sounds a bit like there may be another way beyond resources to specify a service name.
Co-authored-by: Christian Neumüller <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Christian Neumüller <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
I'd add it, as this is easy to overlook by language SIGs. A changelog would make it more easy. |
Co-authored-by: Nikita Salnikov-Tarnovski <[email protected]>
Fixes #1237
Fixes #1380
Small clarification on using the default
Resource
is noservice.name
was used.PS - Don't think we need a CHANGELOG entry for this, but happy to add one if needed.