Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add config support for BaggageSpanProcessor #1330
add config support for BaggageSpanProcessor #1330
Changes from 1 commit
f398623
53bf330
f5b6c6e
a4dca36
cc98df6
456b734
cc65560
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For a moment I thought this wouldn't work because this customizers are applied after the batch exporter is registered, but then I realized that order of registration doesn't matter for span processors which want to take advantage of modifying the span on start.
We would need to make changes in the SDK if this was a
BaggageLogRecordProcessor
: Either providing a hook to customize the logger provider before batch processor is added, or by extendingSdkLoggerProviderBuilder
with a method to insert a processor at the front of the queue.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is a great idea - would make sense for all signals
BTW, I've made the test end-to-end to cover that "onStast" is actually called