-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 287
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
reporter: use semantic convention to report build_id #153
Conversation
open-telemetry/semantic-conventions#1329 got merged, which introduces a semantic convention for build_ids. Use this semantic convention in favor of BuildIdKind, that will be dropped with open-telemetry/opentelemetry-proto#584. Signed-off-by: Florian Lehner <[email protected]>
5216a42
to
f3c461c
Compare
// AttributeUnits - Optional element we do not use. | ||
// LinkTable - Optional element we do not use. | ||
// DropFrames - Optional element we do not use. | ||
// KeepFrames - Optional element we do not use. | ||
// TimeNanos - Optional element we do not use. | ||
// DurationNanos - Optional element we do not use. | ||
// PeriodType - Optional element we do not use. | ||
// Period - Optional element we do not use. | ||
// Comment - Optional element we do not use. | ||
// DefaultSampleType - Optional element we do not use. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd also remove all of these, they're just noise.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No strong feelings here. These comments helped to implement the protocol and to check which fields are implemented and which not. When working on this change, I just noticed, that some of these comments are no longer correct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Do we want to also support sending the Go build id as per spec?
As there is a higher demand for |
open-telemetry/semantic-conventions#1329 got merged, which introduces a semantic convention for build_ids. Use this semantic convention in favor of BuildIdKind, that will be dropped with open-telemetry/opentelemetry-proto#584.