Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Return an error in
service.NewConfigProvider
if there is no configLocations (v0.45) #4762Return an error in
service.NewConfigProvider
if there is no configLocations (v0.45) #4762Changes from 2 commits
697f4bb
0c8c405
e55d31a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if we want a map as argument or one of the next two options:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wanted to implement both approaches in seperate commits but I have an issue with the first.
Due to the fact that 2 of the functions (
service.MustNewConfigProvider
andservice.TestConfigProvider_Errors
) that useWithConfigMapProviders
are usingmap[string]configmapprovider.Provider
approach I need to translate these maps to[]ConfigProviderOption
and after that append this array to other Options and pass them toNewConfigProvider
function.example:
should I create a function that converts config maps to
[]ConfigProviderOption
and appends them to provided optionsto avoid reused code or it's not that big deal?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I prefer this approach. We require that providers have a scheme anyways, so why not a way to determine what they think their scheme is?
An unexported helper function to do this might be useful, but at least
service.MustNewConfigProvider()
is expected to go away in the near future, so I'm not sure how big a deal it is.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After more thoughts on this, I think is the right thing to do, since this will allow us to use the same pattern in the builder to support more providers - builder will look for NewProvider in the given import (similar to NewFactory for components.
Per @Aneurysm9 comment the
service.MustNewConfigProvider()
is going away, and the other one is a test. I would rather look into an example how a distribution with extra providers will use this. Or an example written for this case.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consistency is important.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1