-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[chore] Bump rate at which we process issues #22825
[chore] Bump rate at which we process issues #22825
Conversation
Added a rate_limit check before and after to monitor how this change affects our limits. Output will look something like this:
|
Those numbers look a little off, the docs say we should have a larger request count than that. Could you try printing the headers from a request like this?
|
@evan-bradley Those numbers are from my own token which is why they are so low. But looking at the command again maybe it isn't smart enough to use our token. I'll update the command. |
Got it, thanks. Looks like that API is the right one to use too, let's go with that. |
@evan-bradley here is what it looks like run in my fork, so I'm not confident in it anymore: https://github.com/TylerHelmuth/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/actions/runs/5093968840/jobs/9157205402 |
f9a64a5
to
d603081
Compare
I switched to gh cli and I think thats much more reliable: https://github.com/TylerHelmuth/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/actions/runs/5093988300/jobs/9157251383 |
Agreed, looks better. I think the issue was that the auth token was missing on the curl request. |
Description:
This PR attempts to increase the amount of issues/PRs the
Close State Issues/PRs
actions can process by: