Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

TransactionResult type differs from protobuf schema #106

Closed
Tracked by #115
lealobanov opened this issue Oct 4, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #116
Closed
Tracked by #115

TransactionResult type differs from protobuf schema #106

lealobanov opened this issue Oct 4, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #116
Assignees
@lealobanov

Comments

@lealobanov
Copy link
Collaborator

This is related to: onflow/flow-go-sdk#769
@lealobanov lealobanov added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 4, 2024
@lealobanov lealobanov self-assigned this Oct 4, 2024
@lealobanov
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Related parent issue for missing protobuf fields in Access API classes: onflow/flow-go-sdk#736

@lealobanov lealobanov removed the bug Something isn't working label Oct 4, 2024
This was referenced Oct 4, 2024
Closed
Merged
lealobanov added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 8, 2024
@lealobanov
Merge pull request #116 from onflow/transaction-result-protobuf-schema
86b1d98 
#106/ TransactionResult type differs from protobuf schema
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@lealobanov lealobanov

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

#106/ TransactionResult type differs from protobuf schema onflow/flow-jvm-sdk
1 participant
@lealobanov