Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add goimports linter #599

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024
Merged

Add goimports linter #599

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

janezpodhostnik
Copy link
Contributor

@janezpodhostnik janezpodhostnik commented Sep 30, 2024

Description

I like them sorted, but I often forget.
Please let me know if you disagree.


For contributor use:

  • Targeted PR against master branch
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the standards mentioned here.
  • Updated relevant documentation
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
  • Added appropriate labels

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enabled the "goimports" linter for automatic management of Go imports.
    • Added a new test case for concurrent key rotation to enhance testing robustness.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved organization of import statements in test files for better clarity.
  • Tests

    • Enhanced testing suite with concurrent access scenarios for key rotation functionality.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to three files: the .golangci.toml configuration file, a test file for sequential height models, and a test file for key rotation in a requester service. The .golangci.toml file now enables the "goimports" linter for automatic import management. In the test files, minor adjustments were made to import statements and a new concurrent test case was added to enhance testing for key rotation logic.

Changes

File Change Summary
.golangci.toml Enabled the "goimports" linter for automatic management of Go imports.
models/sequential_height_test.go Adjusted the position of the require import statement; no changes to test logic.
services/requester/rotation_signer_test.go Added a concurrent test case to Test_KeyRotation to verify key rotation under simultaneous access.

Poem

🐰 In the code where imports play,
A linter joins the fray today.
With tests that leap and bounds that grow,
Our keys now dance in a concurrent flow!
Hooray for changes, let’s all cheer,
For cleaner code, we hold so dear! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.golangci.toml (1)

1-4: Consider integrating the linter into your development workflow.

To maximize the benefits of adding the goimports linter (and any other linters you might add), consider integrating it into your development workflow. This can help catch and fix issues early in the development process.

Here are some suggestions:

  1. Set up a pre-commit hook that runs golangci-lint before each commit.
  2. Configure your CI/CD pipeline to run the linter and fail the build if issues are found.
  3. Provide clear documentation for developers on how to run the linter locally.
  4. Consider using a tool like golangci-lint-action in your GitHub Actions workflow.

Example GitHub Action step:

- name: Run golangci-lint
  uses: golangci/golangci-lint-action@v3
  with:
    version: latest

These integrations will help ensure that the linter is consistently used across the project, maintaining code quality and reducing the manual effort required to keep imports sorted.

services/requester/rotation_signer_test.go (3)

Line range hint 44-44: Typo in the test name string

The test description has a typo. It should read "keys being correctly rotated in concurrent access".

Apply this diff to correct the typo:

-t.Run("keys being correctly rotate in concurrent access", func(t *testing.T) {
+t.Run("keys being correctly rotated in concurrent access", func(t *testing.T) {

Line range hint 50-50: Comment does not match the variable value

The comment states that each key is used 10 times, but keyIterations is set to 20. Please update the comment or adjust the variable to reflect the intended number of iterations per key.

If the intention is to use each key 20 times, update the comment:

-keyIterations := 20                     // 10 times each key
+keyIterations := 20                     // 20 times each key

Alternatively, if each key should be used 10 times, modify the variable:

-keyIterations := 20                     // 10 times each key
+keyIterations := 10                     // 10 times each key

Line range hint 58-63: Avoid using t from the testing package inside goroutines

Calling require.NoError(t, err) inside a goroutine is unsafe because the testing.T instance is not concurrent-safe. This can lead to race conditions and undefined behavior.

To safely handle errors in goroutines, consider collecting errors and checking them after all goroutines have completed. Here's a refactored version:

errs := make(chan error, iterations)

// Modify the goroutine:
go func() {
	defer wg.Done()
	sig, err := krs.Sign(data)
	if err != nil {
		errs <- err
		return
	}
	sigs <- sig
}()

// After starting all goroutines:
wg.Wait()
close(sigs)
close(errs)

// Check for errors after all goroutines have completed
for err := range errs {
	require.NoError(t, err)
}

This ensures that error handling remains in the main goroutine, maintaining thread safety.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7707105 and 0fd21da.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .golangci.toml (1 hunks)
  • models/sequential_height_test.go (1 hunks)
  • services/requester/rotation_signer_test.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • models/sequential_height_test.go
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.golangci.toml (1)

1-4: LGTM! The goimports linter has been successfully added.

The change aligns well with the PR objectives. Enabling the goimports linter will automatically sort imports in Go files, which addresses your preference for sorted imports and helps prevent forgetting to sort them manually.

To ensure this change doesn't cause unexpected issues, please run the following verification steps:

  1. Run golangci-lint on the entire codebase to check for any immediate issues:

  2. Check for any Go files with unsorted imports that might be affected:

  3. If the previous command finds any files, review them to ensure the changes are acceptable.

These steps will help identify any potential conflicts or issues before merging the PR.

Comment on lines +1 to +4
[linters]
enable = [
"goimports",
]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider enabling additional linters for comprehensive code quality checks.

While adding goimports is a great start, you might want to consider enabling other useful linters to further improve code quality and consistency. Some commonly used linters include:

  1. govet: Examines Go source code and reports suspicious constructs.
  2. staticcheck: Provides extensive static analysis checks.
  3. errcheck: Checks that error returns are used.
  4. ineffassign: Detects ineffectual assignments.

You could expand the linters list like this:

 [linters]
 enable = [
     "goimports",
+    "govet",
+    "staticcheck",
+    "errcheck",
+    "ineffassign",
 ]

This suggestion aligns with the PR checklist item about adhering to style guidelines, as these additional linters can help enforce consistent coding practices across the project.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
[linters]
enable = [
"goimports",
]
[linters]
enable = [
"goimports",
"govet",
"staticcheck",
"errcheck",
"ineffassign",
]

Copy link
Collaborator

@m-Peter m-Peter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice 💯

@janezpodhostnik janezpodhostnik merged commit e89b056 into main Sep 30, 2024
2 checks passed
@m-Peter m-Peter deleted the janez/enable-more-linters branch October 8, 2024 12:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants