Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sync compiler feature branch #3783

Closed
wants to merge 59 commits into from
Closed

Sync compiler feature branch #3783

wants to merge 59 commits into from

Conversation

turbolent
Copy link
Member

Work towards #3742

Description

Update the compiler feature branch by merging master into it.


  • Targeted PR against master branch
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work
  • Code follows the standards mentioned here
  • Updated relevant documentation
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
  • Added appropriate labels

turbolent and others added 30 commits November 26, 2024 14:03
Update readme to add reference to Cadence working group
e.g. "Missing go.mod entry for dep onflow/flowkit/v2"
Machine readable syntax specification
SupunS and others added 23 commits February 18, 2025 09:02
Merge `release/v1.3.2` to `v1.3`
Port internal fixes to master
…urrent activation

pushing an additional activation would also have to get popped at the end
of the function call to ensure the activation stack stays balanced
@turbolent turbolent requested a review from jsproz February 19, 2025 23:14
@turbolent turbolent self-assigned this Feb 19, 2025
@turbolent turbolent requested a review from SupunS as a code owner February 19, 2025 23:14
Copy link

Cadence Benchstat comparison

This branch with compared with the base branch onflow:feature/compiler commit f694f6e
The command for i in {1..N}; do go test ./... -run=XXX -bench=. -benchmem -shuffle=on; done was used.
Bench tests were run a total of 7 times on each branch.

Collapsed results for better readability

@turbolent
Copy link
Member Author

Replaced by #3785

@turbolent turbolent closed this Feb 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants