Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix nested values not validated when type not subclass and nested keys for subclass #506

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 22, 2024

Conversation

mauvilsa
Copy link
Member

What does this PR do?

Resolves the issue mentioned in #503 (comment)

Before submitting

  • Did you read the contributing guideline?
  • [n/a] Did you update the documentation? (readme and public docstrings)
  • Did you write unit tests such that there is 100% coverage on related code? (required for bug fixes and new features)
  • Did you verify that new and existing tests pass locally?
  • Did you make sure that all changes preserve backward compatibility?
  • Did you update the CHANGELOG? (not for typos, docs, test updates, or minor internal changes/refactors)

…eys for subclass (#503).

- When parsing fails due to unexpected key, now there are specific error messages for the cases of groups and subcommands.
@mauvilsa mauvilsa added bug Something isn't working refactor Improvements to the quality of the code labels May 22, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (797f004) to head (3f0ab9a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #506   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           21        21           
  Lines         6139      6147    +8     
=========================================
+ Hits          6139      6147    +8     
Flag Coverage Δ
py3.10 87.29% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
py3.10_all 98.64% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
py3.10_pydantic1 49.09% <83.33%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
py3.10_pydantic2 48.86% <83.33%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
py3.10_types 98.66% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
py3.11 87.27% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
py3.11_all 98.64% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
py3.11_types 98.66% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
py3.12 87.42% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
py3.12_all 98.64% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
py3.12_types 98.66% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
py3.7 87.83% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
py3.7_all 99.26% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
py3.7_types 99.26% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
py3.8 88.00% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
py3.8_all 99.41% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
py3.8_types 99.41% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
py3.9 87.84% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
py3.9_all 99.28% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
py3.9_types 99.30% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@mauvilsa mauvilsa merged commit ef1a267 into main May 22, 2024
27 checks passed
@mauvilsa mauvilsa deleted the fix-missing-validation branch May 22, 2024 07:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working refactor Improvements to the quality of the code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant