Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FW][I18N] migrate to the nex transifex API #3533

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

fw-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@fw-bot fw-bot commented Feb 10, 2023

Tansifex is deprecating it's client and switches to a go-based solution in its API v3

The new client is still backward compatible with the old format but the v2 API is going to be phased out.
See https://github.com/transifex/cli to install the deplyments using the tx client

This PR is the result of the "tx migrate" command

Forward-Port-Of: #3525
Forward-Port-Of: #3500

@robodoo
Copy link
Collaborator

robodoo commented Feb 10, 2023

@fw-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fw-bot commented Feb 10, 2023

@mart-e cherrypicking of pull request #3500 failed.

stdout:

Auto-merging .tx/config
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in .tx/config

stderr:

09:42:15.505517 git.c:455               trace: built-in: git cherry-pick 730140a2120a0a87ceb8ec1df08a55b60f7fbb78
error: could not apply 730140a2... [I18N] migrate to the nex transifex API
hint: After resolving the conflicts, mark them with
hint: "git add/rm <pathspec>", then run
hint: "git cherry-pick --continue".
hint: You can instead skip this commit with "git cherry-pick --skip".
hint: To abort and get back to the state before "git cherry-pick",
hint: run "git cherry-pick --abort".
----------
status:

Either perform the forward-port manually (and push to this branch, proceeding as usual) or close this PR (maybe?).

In the former case, you may want to edit this PR message as well.

@mart-e mart-e force-pushed the saas-16.1-14.0-tx-migrate-mat-_ZNm-fw branch 2 times, most recently from 8bbed25 to 365628a Compare February 10, 2023 08:56
Tansifex is deprecating it's client and switches to a go-based
solution in its API v3

The new client is still backward compatible with the old format but
the v2 API is going to be phased out.
See https://github.com/transifex/cli to install the deplyments using
the tx client

This PR is the result of the "tx migrate" command

In saas-16.1 force the content of 16.0

X-original-commit: 566449f
@mart-e mart-e force-pushed the saas-16.1-14.0-tx-migrate-mat-_ZNm-fw branch from 365628a to f17ede4 Compare February 10, 2023 08:57
@mart-e
Copy link
Contributor

mart-e commented Feb 10, 2023

robodoo r+

@C3POdoo C3POdoo requested a review from a team February 10, 2023 08:59
robodoo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2023
Tansifex is deprecating it's client and switches to a go-based
solution in its API v3

The new client is still backward compatible with the old format but
the v2 API is going to be phased out.
See https://github.com/transifex/cli to install the deplyments using
the tx client

This PR is the result of the "tx migrate" command

In saas-16.1 force the content of 16.0

closes #3533

X-original-commit: 566449f
Related: odoo/enterprise#36934
Related: odoo/odoo#112382
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <[email protected]>
robodoo pushed a commit to odoo/odoo that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2023
Tansifex is deprecating it's client and switches to a go-based
solution in its API v3

The new client is still backward compatible with the old format but
the v2 API is going to be phased out.
See https://github.com/transifex/cli to install the deplyments using
the tx client

This PR is the result of the "tx migrate" command

closes #112382

Transifex: adapt to new URL format
X-original-commit: d6ff011
Related: odoo/enterprise#36934
Related: odoo/documentation#3533
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <[email protected]>
@robodoo robodoo temporarily deployed to merge February 10, 2023 11:41 Inactive
@robodoo robodoo closed this Feb 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants