Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lwt.pick and Lwt.choose pick preferentially failed promises #874

Conversation

raphael-proust
Copy link
Collaborator

Fix #856 (check for details)

Note that the pick/choose tests were checking for the actual behaviour rather than the documented behaviour. This MR also adapts the tests.

@smorimoto smorimoto force-pushed the pick-should-preferentially-fail-as-per-documentation branch from 7c5b453 to c2f77f8 Compare November 7, 2021 06:01
@smorimoto smorimoto requested a review from aantron November 11, 2021 19:04
@smorimoto smorimoto added the bug label Nov 11, 2021
@raphael-proust raphael-proust force-pushed the pick-should-preferentially-fail-as-per-documentation branch from cb7389d to 1fcc916 Compare November 17, 2021 09:38
@smorimoto smorimoto force-pushed the pick-should-preferentially-fail-as-per-documentation branch from 1fcc916 to 2dad87d Compare January 3, 2022 14:03
@raphael-proust raphael-proust merged commit 1b123ff into ocsigen:master Jan 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Semantics of Lwt.pick / choose
2 participants