Mark Slacko as potentially compatible with Lwt 4.0 #11760
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
According to the nice comment by @aantron in #11708 (comment) slacko fails because it expects
lwt.log
to exist without depending on thelwt_log
message.This came to a surprise to me since Slacko does not do any logging at all, so constraining it does not seem to be useful.
Looking in the CI log
https://ci.ocamllabs.io/log/saved/docker-run-e97b0a51ae9b04229ade4297103e6c79/e87df7e1b52e41541b179ab4024a538bfd0b1484 I can see that the error came from a module in "lwt/cohttp_lwt_unix.ml" which happens when building
cohttp.0.21.1
.Therefore I would like to correct the dependency here. If any version of
cohttp
<0.99
would be compatible with Lwt 4 (e.g. if someone does a maintenance release), so would slacko.