Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(core): adds feature for LLM enhancing #30072

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2025
Merged

Conversation

juristr
Copy link
Member

@juristr juristr commented Feb 17, 2025

adds a new feature page for the LLM enhancements.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 17, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
nx-dev ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 17, 2025 4:31pm

Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Feb 17, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 89aef43.

Command Status Duration Result
nx affected --targets=lint,test,build,e2e,e2e-c... ✅ Succeeded 3m 38s View ↗
nx run-many -t check-imports check-commit check... ✅ Succeeded 14s View ↗
nx-cloud record -- nx-cloud conformance:check ✅ Succeeded 2s View ↗
nx-cloud record -- nx format:check --base= --he... ✅ Succeeded 7s View ↗
nx-cloud record -- nx sync:check ✅ Succeeded 5s View ↗
nx documentation ✅ Succeeded 1m 28s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-02-17 16:29:01 UTC

@juristr juristr force-pushed the docs/llm-enhanced-feature branch from baf9e9c to 89f0f1b Compare February 17, 2025 16:14
@juristr juristr marked this pull request as ready for review February 17, 2025 16:17
@juristr juristr requested review from a team as code owners February 17, 2025 16:17
@juristr juristr requested a review from leosvelperez February 17, 2025 16:17
@juristr juristr merged commit 5887baf into master Feb 17, 2025
13 of 14 checks passed
@juristr juristr deleted the docs/llm-enhanced-feature branch February 17, 2025 16:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants