-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 240
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RFC21: bring back subset of npm_package_* environs #183
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what about
npm_package_exports
,npm_package_private
, etc? or are these just the ones that have known uses?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are the ones that have known uses, have been around a long time, and aren't terribly complicated to put in the environment.
The
"exports"
field is an object, and if you have something like"exports": {".": {"import": "./index.mjs"}}
, that'd env-ify intonpm_package_exports___import="./index.mjs"
(since.
is stripped out) which is a bit weird.In other words, there is a point where it's fair to say, look, if you wanna know what's in
package.json
, write a JavaScript program and parse it or dorequire('./package.json')
. The line drawn by RFC21 as it currently stands is "anything"; if you want package.json at all, you parse it, here's the filename, have fun. The pushback (which I think is reasonable) is that there are a few things you might want to put in command lines in the package.json itself, without having to write a whole other script to do it.So this is just the stuff that's likely to be used by a package lifecycle script, where you might want to have something like
"scripts": {"start":"node $npm_package_bin_start_server"}
or something.