Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

resync team with README #224

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2018
Merged

resync team with README #224

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2018

Conversation

Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Aug 25, 2018

@rmg removed themselves from the @nodejs/diagnostics team on June 20. Resynch the list of people in the README against the GitHub team.

(The team currently has 31 people. If there are really that many people active in the Diagnostics WG, then awesome! But if that contains a lot of folks who aren't active anymore, it might be a good idea to do some pruning. Or not if extra folks don't adversely affect anything. In some groups, that can be a problem when doing things like taking votes or abiding by rules about quorum.)

@rmg removed themselves from the @nodejs/diagnostics team on June 20. Resynch the list of people in the README against the GitHub team.

(The team currently has 31 people. If there are really that many people active in the Diagnostics WG, then awesome! But if that contains a lot of folks who aren't active anymore, it might be a good idea to do some pruning. Or not if extra folks don't adversely affect anything. In some groups, that can be a problem when doing things like taking votes or abiding by rules about quorum.)
@richardlau
Copy link
Member

(The team currently has 31 people. If there are really that many people active in the Diagnostics WG, then awesome! But if that contains a lot of folks who aren't active anymore, it might be a good idea to do some pruning. Or not if extra folks don't adversely affect anything. In some groups, that can be a problem when doing things like taking votes or abiding by rules about quorum.)

There's a revalidation effort currently going on in #217.

richardlau

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Aug 31, 2018

(Can someone on Diagnostics land this?)

@AndreasMadsen AndreasMadsen merged commit 066fed7 into master Aug 31, 2018
@gireeshpunathil gireeshpunathil deleted the Trott-patch-1 branch August 14, 2021 14:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants