This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 22, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
doc: add minutes for 2017 Apr 13 #32
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ | ||
# Node.js Foundation CommComm Meeting 2017-04-13 | ||
|
||
## Links | ||
|
||
* **GitHub Issue**: [community-committee#27](https://github.com/nodejs/community-committee/issues/27) | ||
* **Minutes Google Doc**: : https://docs.google.com/document/d/18d2XeUP_dB4dyLzjO6wqs6NiaSaUxLFDyXYL_HFTEDc/ | ||
* _Previous Minutes Google Doc_: N/A (first meeting!) | ||
|
||
## Present | ||
* Rachel White @rachelnicole (CommComm) | ||
* Myles Borins @MylesBorins (CommComm) | ||
* JP Wesselink @jpwesselink (CommComm) | ||
* William Kapke @williamkapke (CommComm) | ||
* Bryan Hughes @nebrius (CommComm) | ||
* Tracy Hinds @hackygolucky (CommComm) | ||
* Michelle Garrett @msmichellegar (Observer) | ||
|
||
## Agenda | ||
|
||
* Elect a Chairperson [#30](https://github.com/nodejs/community-committee/issues/30) | ||
* Collaborator's Summit agenda [#28](https://github.com/nodejs/community-committee/issues/28) | ||
* governance: who has voting rights? [#21](https://github.com/nodejs/community-committee/issues/21) | ||
* Add some scope (aka: stake your claim!) [#13](https://github.com/nodejs/community-committee/issues/13) | ||
* Central communication medium for chatting in Node.js [#11](https://github.com/nodejs/community-committee/issues/11) | ||
|
||
## Review of last meeting | ||
|
||
N/A (first meeting!) | ||
|
||
## Minutes | ||
|
||
### Elect a Chairperson [#30](https://github.com/nodejs/community-committee/issues/30) | ||
William Kapke opened. Chair is responsible for what’s going on around the committee. Organizing meetings and agenda. This committee uses the individual directors as representatives to the Board. Think about it if you are interested! Next meeting we’ll have discussions around this, potentially have a vote. | ||
|
||
_To do_: expand and clarify role of Chairperson for potential candidates. (@nebrius) | ||
|
||
|
||
### Collaborator's Summit agenda [#28](https://github.com/nodejs/community-committee/issues/28) | ||
May 4-5 in Berlin, hope to see you there | ||
Awesome way to get everyone in the same room | ||
Roll call: Myles, William, Bryan, Ashley, Rachel | ||
|
||
Agenda to submit: | ||
|
||
- Can we get everyone together to talk Moderation? Scope should cover more space. How CommComm can help. | ||
- What communities can we help with and how do we connect? | ||
- Meta-contribution session–let’s find a way to bridge the gap between Code + Learn transitioning the afternoon into Collab Summit in the Fall | ||
- Moderation training | ||
|
||
Let’s brainstorm more ideas in the issue, too. | ||
|
||
### governance: who has voting rights? [#21](https://github.com/nodejs/community-committee/issues/21) | ||
For the time being, can we put this on hold? The members have voting rights. What are these external groups and how they want to weigh in on things? | ||
|
||
Another question: do we need to have the distinction between the two? | ||
|
||
_To do_: If we leave the charter as-is(and we just let members vote), would we be violating the charter? (@williamkapke) | ||
|
||
|
||
### Add some scope (aka: stake your claim!) [#13](https://github.com/nodejs/community-committee/issues/13) | ||
Rachel White would love to see a number of orgs participate or be in the community committee: | ||
https://github.com/nodejs/code-and-learn | ||
https://github.com/nodejs/education | ||
https://github.com/nodejs/evangelism | ||
https://github.com/nodejs/inclusivity | ||
|
||
Our hope is that TSC and CTC feel a part of the Community Committee. This is important to stress and that repos being a part of this is not a landgrab. Outreach and talking about interest in participating is important. We aren’t inviting people to move over without them explicitly stating as a group that they’d like to. | ||
|
||
To do: outreach to groups listed in this issue to gauge interest (@hackygolucky, and possibly @rachelnicole?) | ||
|
||
|
||
### Central communication medium for chatting in Node.js [#11](https://github.com/nodejs/community-committee/issues/11) | ||
IRC vs. Slack! | ||
How do we make this decision? | ||
|
||
CTC, existing moderators, and community-at-large should each get a separate input mechanism. | ||
|
||
Why not have both exist? Are we creating this for the collaborators? For the community? What about the moderators? | ||
|
||
Is this really a support issue? Are we properly supporting our community? nodejs/help is a great way for people to answer questions, but this isn’t realtime feedback. Can we hook /help into a chat but then make sure there’s protocol for making /help the source of truth for that answer for others to reference later? | ||
|
||
Can we let the community build their spaces? | ||
|
||
To do (@hackygolucky): | ||
- Make an official, CoC compliant list of places we can send folks needing help! | ||
- Document what problems we are trying to solve | ||
- Update the cross-posted issue that we propose not to choose one over the other | ||
- Moderation training | ||
- Can we create a hook from /help into IRC and/or Slack for people to get smaller help in realtime | ||
|
||
## Q/A | ||
N/A | ||
|
||
## Next Meeting | ||
|
||
Node.js Foundation calendar: Coming Soon! | ||
|
||
Next meeting: 2017-04-27 2000 UTC (Thursday 1pm US Pacific). |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.