Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add event for inserting cache entries #13748

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2019
Merged

Conversation

icewind1991
Copy link
Member

@icewind1991 icewind1991 commented Jan 22, 2019

this provides a reliable way for apps to listen to new files
without the need to of cache wrappers to hook into inserts themselves
(something which isn't 100% reliable)

@icewind1991 icewind1991 added the 2. developing Work in progress label Jan 22, 2019
@icewind1991 icewind1991 added 3. to review Waiting for reviews and removed 2. developing Work in progress labels Jan 22, 2019
@icewind1991 icewind1991 added this to the Nextcloud 16 milestone Jan 22, 2019
@icewind1991
Copy link
Member Author

@rullzer all done

this provides a reliable way for apps to listen to new files
without the need to of cache wrappers to hook into inserts themselves
(something which isn't 100% reliable)

Signed-off-by: Robin Appelman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Robin Appelman <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@rullzer rullzer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like it!

Copy link
Member

@MorrisJobke MorrisJobke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks good and works 👍

@MorrisJobke MorrisJobke merged commit baa6a2d into master Feb 7, 2019
@MorrisJobke MorrisJobke deleted the cache-insert-event branch February 7, 2019 15:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3. to review Waiting for reviews
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants