Temporary disabling multi arch builds

[OlivierCazade]

Description

Disabling multi arch builds to unblock builds while we investigate.

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

• Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
• Does this PR require product documentation?
  • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
• Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
  • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
• Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
  • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
• QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
  • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
  • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
  • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from oliviercazade. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[jotak]

@memodi @Amoghrd is that something you'd like to have on the main branch too, for unlocking builds, or just release-1.8 is sufficient?

[memodi]

@memodi @Amoghrd is that something you'd like to have on the main branch too, for unlocking builds, or just release-1.8 is sufficient?

I think just 1.8 is sufficient. For main we can always work off the upstream builds.

[memodi]

@memodi @Amoghrd is that something you'd like to have on the main branch too, for unlocking builds, or just release-1.8 is sufficient?

I think just 1.8 is sufficient. For main we can always work off the upstream builds.

actually, I take that back, actually since our e2e tests works off konflux builds, so blocking them here until we fix the issues would be useful.

[jotak]

/lgtm

[OlivierCazade]

/retest

[OlivierCazade]

/retest

[openshift-ci]

@OlivierCazade: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/plugin-cypress	bc92a22	link	true	/test plugin-cypress
ci/prow/qe-e2e-console-tests	bc92a22	link	false	/test qe-e2e-console-tests

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[OlivierCazade]

Closing since #718 is fixing the build errors.