Update GitHub workflow files

[bakgaard]

Breaking change

No breaking changes

Proposed change

• Reenable ci_analyze.yml when merging into main
• Add GitHub Actions to dependabot
• Update all Actions to latest major version

Type of change

• Dependency upgrade
• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
• Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
• Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

• This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
• This PR is related to issue:
• Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

• The code change is tested and works locally.
• Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
• The code compiles without warnings (code quality check)
• Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration are added/changed:

• Documentation added/updated for https://netdaemon.xyz

[helto4real]

Thanks a lot!! Love these kinds of contributions. I will do a proper review tomorrow after work.

[bakgaard]

No rush.

It all comes down to getting rid of warnings when building.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82%. Comparing base (51b2d09) to head (d8707b6).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@         Coverage Diff          @@
##           main   #1224   +/-   ##
====================================
  Coverage    82%     82%           
====================================
  Files       196     196           
  Lines      3840    3840           
  Branches    426     426           
====================================
  Hits       3159    3159           
  Misses      516     516           
  Partials    165     165           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	82% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[helto4real]

Looks good, thanks for this!

[helto4real]

@bakgaard please make sure the commits are signed for better security. I let this one pass for now since it was an easy review.

https://docs.github.com/authentication/managing-commit-signature-verification/about-commit-signature-verification

[bakgaard]

Odd, I thought it was.
I will fix it for future commits.