Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Script structure refactoring #9

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2019

Conversation

xxuejie
Copy link
Contributor

@xxuejie xxuejie commented Mar 22, 2019

No description provided.

bors bot added a commit to nervosnetwork/ckb that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2019
344: refactor: Revise script structure r=doitian a=xxuejie

* [x] rfc changes: nervosnetwork/rfcs#91
* [x] ckb-system-scripts: nervosnetwork/ckb-system-scripts#2
* [x] mruby-contracts: nervosnetwork/mruby-contracts#7
* [x] ruby sdk: nervosnetwork/ckb-demo-ruby#76
* [x] ruby scripts: nervosnetwork/ckb-ruby-scripts#9
* [ ] swift sdk
* [ ] java sdk
* [ ] js sdk

---

This is a **BREAKING CHANGE**.

Co-authored-by: Xuejie Xiao <[email protected]>
bors bot added a commit to nervosnetwork/ckb that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2019
344: refactor: Revise script structure r=xxuejie a=xxuejie

* [x] rfc changes: nervosnetwork/rfcs#91
* [x] ckb-system-scripts: nervosnetwork/ckb-system-scripts#2
* [x] mruby-contracts: nervosnetwork/mruby-contracts#7
* [x] ruby sdk: nervosnetwork/ckb-demo-ruby#76
* [x] ruby scripts: nervosnetwork/ckb-ruby-scripts#9
* [ ] swift sdk
* [ ] java sdk
* [ ] js sdk

---

This is a **BREAKING CHANGE**.

Co-authored-by: Xuejie Xiao <[email protected]>
@xxuejie xxuejie force-pushed the script-structure-refactoring branch from 841e05b to ef430db Compare March 29, 2019 07:58
@xxuejie xxuejie merged commit 259a76e into nervosnetwork:master Mar 29, 2019
@xxuejie xxuejie deleted the script-structure-refactoring branch March 29, 2019 07:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants