Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update wasmtime #12890

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

chore: update wasmtime #12890

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

nagisa
Copy link
Collaborator

@nagisa nagisa commented Feb 7, 2025

audit is raising a concern that wit-parser which the older version of wasmtime depends on has been yanked. Fixes CI.

@nagisa nagisa requested a review from a team as a code owner February 7, 2025 15:36
@nagisa nagisa requested a review from akhi3030 February 7, 2025 15:36
audit is raising a concern that wit-parser which the older version of
wasmtime depends on has been yanked. Fixes CI.
@nagisa nagisa enabled auto-merge February 7, 2025 15:43
these are mostly because of changes to wasm-smith and nothing else
substantial
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.54%. Comparing base (5f68d8c) to head (cca2a77).
Report is 6 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #12890       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    1.70%   70.54%   +68.83%     
===========================================
  Files         676      851      +175     
  Lines      121191   174523    +53332     
  Branches   121191   174523    +53332     
===========================================
+ Hits         2065   123109   +121044     
+ Misses     119010    46295    -72715     
- Partials      116     5119     +5003     
Flag Coverage Δ
backward-compatibility 0.35% <0.00%> (?)
db-migration 0.35% <0.00%> (?)
genesis-check 1.40% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
linux 70.14% <100.00%> (+68.43%) ⬆️
linux-nightly 70.17% <100.00%> (?)
pytests 1.71% <0.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
sanity-checks 1.52% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
unittests 70.36% <100.00%> (?)
upgradability 0.35% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant