Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIXED] Clear all pre-acks for seq upon removing message #6325

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

MauriceVanVeen
Copy link
Member

If a message in a stream was removed/erased/purged the pre-acks would not be cleared for that sequence. This meant that pre-acks could remain and potentially result in a memory leak.

There was also a call to mset.clearAllPreAcks(last) where the write lock was not held. Updated mset.setLastSeq to require a write lock to already be held, so we don't need to keep locking/unlocking multiple times.

Also de-flakes TestNoRaceJetStreamClusterUnbalancedInterestMultipleConsumers due to:

  • remaining pre-acks that should have been cleared
  • messages being removed asynchronously due to going through proposals (added checkFor)

Signed-off-by: Maurice van Veen [email protected]

@MauriceVanVeen MauriceVanVeen requested a review from a team as a code owner January 6, 2025 12:54
Copy link
Member

@derekcollison derekcollison left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@derekcollison derekcollison merged commit 6177130 into main Jan 6, 2025
5 checks passed
@derekcollison derekcollison deleted the maurice/remove-clears-pre-acks branch January 6, 2025 13:49
wallyqs added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2025
#### Dependencies
- #6323
- #6324

####  Leafnode
- #6291

#### JetStream
- #6226
- #6235
- #6277
- #6279
- #6283
- #6289
- #6316
- #6317
- #6325
- #6326
- #6335
- #6338
- #6341
- #6344
- #6150
- #6351
- #6355

#### Tests
- #6278
- #6297
- #6300
- #6343
- #6329
- #6330
- #6331
- #6332
- #6334
- #6356
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants