Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add support for reading from remote resources #18

Closed
davemfish opened this issue Mar 4, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #19
Closed

add support for reading from remote resources #18

davemfish opened this issue Mar 4, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #19
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@davemfish
Copy link
Collaborator

It's common that someone will want to create metadata for a dataset that is already stored remotely somewhere. So geometamaker should be able to open a dataset at a remote URL, read file metadata (e.g. gdalinfo stuff), and read any existing MCF.

GDAL (and for the most part pygeoprocessing) can already do this. So added functionality we need from geometamaker is the ability to read an existing remote MCF.

@davemfish davemfish added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 4, 2024
@davemfish davemfish self-assigned this Mar 4, 2024
davemfish added a commit to davemfish/geometamaker that referenced this issue Mar 6, 2024
davemfish added a commit to davemfish/geometamaker that referenced this issue Mar 6, 2024
davemfish added a commit to davemfish/geometamaker that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2024
davemfish added a commit to davemfish/geometamaker that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2024
davemfish added a commit to davemfish/geometamaker that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2024
davemfish added a commit to davemfish/geometamaker that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2024
davemfish added a commit to davemfish/geometamaker that referenced this issue Mar 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant