Stop special-casing the (very unlikely) "no /XObject
found"-scenario, when parsing OPS.paintXObject
operators, in PartialEvaluator.{getOperatorList, getTextContent}
#12090
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Originally there weren't any (generally) good ways to handle errors gracefully, on the worker-side, however that's no longer the case and we can simply fallback to the existing
ignoreErrors
functionality instead.Also, please note that the "no
/XObject
found"-scenario should be extremely unlikely in practice and would only occur in corrupt/broken documents.Note that the
PartialEvaluator.getOperatorList
case is especially bad currently, since we'll simply (attempt to) send the data as-is to the main-thread. This is quite bad, since in a corrupt/broken document the data could contain anything and e.g. be unclonable (which would cause breaking errors).Also, we're (obviously) not attempting to do anything with this "raw"
OPS.paintXObject
data on the main-thread and simply ensuring that we never send it definately seems like the correct approach.