-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 581
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sync with MoveIt #834
Sync with MoveIt #834
Conversation
Regression of 93c3f63 Closes: moveit#2804
This was a workaround for catkin/catkin_tools#594, which is no longer needed because python3-catkin-tools 0.7 added the required dependency.
Because std::make_pair uses the decayed type (std::string), the strings were actually copied into a temporary, which was subsequently referenced by the elements of std::pair, leading to a stack-use-after-scope error. Explicitly passing const references into std::make_pair via std::cref() resolves the issue mentioned in #2809.
We need to pass the current PlanningScene down to the actual collision checking methods
* fix getting wrong type ID * update unit test
…t#2833) If the MP plugin was created in a non-rviz context (e.g. directly via librviz), there might be no window manager and thus no parent widget available for panels.
This commit makes the trajectory visualization topic relative. This was done to make sure that it respects the namespaces that are set in launch files. Co-authored-by: Felix von Drigalski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Michael Görner <[email protected]>
- Remove convertToRobotTrajectory() and integrate its line of code into setSuccessResponse() - Pass the final start_state into setSuccessResponse() Co-authored-by: Cristian Beltran <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Robert Haschke <[email protected]>
This may cause conflicts with #452, not sure which one we want to merge first |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This has a bunch of Pilz planner changes. @henningkayser should look over this to make sure these changes are in line with what he's changed in his Pilz port.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #834 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 56.68% 56.67% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 200 200
Lines 21660 21660
==========================================
- Hits 12276 12273 -3
- Misses 9384 9387 +3
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for preparing this! I reviewed the changes related to PILZ, and I think I'll just rebase that PR.
Description
Synced the following commits from MoveIt