Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add explanations to imports in generators.py #179

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 17, 2021
Merged

Conversation

amureki
Copy link
Collaborator

@amureki amureki commented Apr 17, 2021

To match with currently supported Django versions (2.2+).

@amureki amureki self-assigned this Apr 17, 2021
@amureki amureki force-pushed the cleaned_up_model_imports branch 2 times, most recently from 16c7e98 to bb966ba Compare April 17, 2021 10:01
@amureki amureki changed the title Cleaned up model field imports in generators.py Add explanations to imports in generators.py Apr 17, 2021
@amureki amureki force-pushed the cleaned_up_model_imports branch from bb966ba to 0b32575 Compare April 17, 2021 10:06
@amureki amureki requested a review from a team April 17, 2021 10:10
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@berinhard berinhard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for reducing the confusion within the imports by adding these comments @amureki! I'mm with @anapaulagomes in the changelog comment, but besides that this is good work

Rust Saiargaliev added 2 commits April 17, 2021 16:43
To match with currently supported Django versions (2.2+).
@amureki amureki force-pushed the cleaned_up_model_imports branch from 0b32575 to 78ef789 Compare April 17, 2021 14:45
@amureki amureki merged commit 59fc369 into main Apr 17, 2021
@amureki amureki deleted the cleaned_up_model_imports branch April 17, 2021 14:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants