Add Mistral and Phi to model table #1553
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I was looking into running a good embedding model locally. The popular embedding model leaderboard currently (2024-01-07) shows
e5-mistral-7b-instruct
as top entry. I checked mlc-llm's README and it didn't seem to support the Mistral architecture. Only when checking the docs that turned out to be wrong.=> As many people might be quick to leave when not finding Mistral on the README, I propose to include this info on the README directly, instead of only in the docs.
To have a smaller README, maybe some of the other listed models can be removed, which might be less popular?
It might also be worth adding one row with
...
or... (see docs)
with a link, to the docs, which might make clearer that people should check the link and it's easier/quicker to see than reading the text paragraph above the table.If you want, I can adjust this PR accordingly.