Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added default NIST_ID tags of SA-11 and RA-5 to sonarqube_mapper #50

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 16, 2021

Conversation

jsa5593
Copy link
Contributor

@jsa5593 jsa5593 commented May 27, 2020

Added default NIST_ID tags of SA-11 and RA-5 to sonarqube_mapper
closes #24

@aaronlippold aaronlippold requested a review from ejaronne May 27, 2020 15:52
@aaronlippold
Copy link
Member

@ejaronne please propose the text needed in the README / docs for this.

@aaronlippold aaronlippold added the enhancement New feature or request label May 27, 2020
@aaronlippold
Copy link
Member

aaronlippold commented May 27, 2020

sonarqube_mapper

sonarqube_mapper pulls SonarQube results, for the specified project, from the API and outputs in HDF format Json to be viewed on Heimdall

USAGE: heimdall_tools sonarqube_mapper [OPTIONS] -n -u -o <scan-results.json>

Default / Unmapped NIST 800-53 Controls

Sonarqube does not always map ... in these cases we know that the geneneral catigory of weakness aligns to SA-11 and RA-5 in the general case. ....

Usage and Flags

FLAGS:
-n --name : Project Key of the project in SonarQube
-u --api_url : url of the SonarQube Server API. Typically ends with /api.
--auth : username:password or token [optional].
-o --output : path to output scan-results json.
-V --verbose : verbose run [optional].

example:

heimdall_tools sonarqube_mapper -n sonar_project_key -u http://sonar:9000/api -o scan_results.json

heimdall_tools sonarqube_mapper -n sonar_project_key -u http://sonar:9000/api --auth admin:admin -o scan_results.json

@jsa5593 jsa5593 force-pushed the sonarqube_mapping branch from b91f914 to 34b3195 Compare June 10, 2020 21:54
@aaronlippold aaronlippold requested a review from rx294 June 16, 2020 22:07
@aaronlippold
Copy link
Member

@rx294 and @ejaronne please review and approve

@aaronlippold
Copy link
Member

aaronlippold commented Jun 16, 2020 via email

@aaronlippold aaronlippold requested review from rbclark, Bialogs, a team and aaronlippold and removed request for rx294 July 2, 2020 14:59
Copy link
Member

@aaronlippold aaronlippold left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I pulled out the 'Rev_4' from the tags array.

@rbclark
Copy link
Contributor

rbclark commented Jul 7, 2020

I pulled out the 'Rev_4' from the tags array.

It is still there in the fortify mapper, was it your intent to leave it there?

@jsa5593 jsa5593 force-pushed the sonarqube_mapping branch from f0debe7 to a12435b Compare July 7, 2020 18:27
@aaronlippold
Copy link
Member

aaronlippold commented Jul 7, 2020 via email

@aaronlippold
Copy link
Member

none of the conversation tools should put the rev version in the output

@aaronlippold aaronlippold requested a review from rbclark February 16, 2021 03:42
@aaronlippold
Copy link
Member

@rbclark @Bialogs can we re-review this again, and fix and merge it to close it out.

@Bialogs Bialogs merged commit 2b63d63 into master Feb 16, 2021
@Bialogs Bialogs deleted the sonarqube_mapping branch February 16, 2021 16:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use SA-11, RA-5 for unmapped
4 participants