Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

0.5.0 release #1604

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 30, 2023
Merged

0.5.0 release #1604

merged 7 commits into from
Sep 30, 2023

Conversation

adamjstewart
Copy link
Collaborator

@adamjstewart adamjstewart added this to the 0.5.0 milestone Sep 30, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the testing Continuous integration testing label Sep 30, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the datamodules PyTorch Lightning datamodules label Sep 30, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Sep 30, 2023
adamjstewart
adamjstewart commented Sep 30, 2023
View reviewed changes
torchgeo/datamodules/chesapeake.py
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ def __init__(
"""
# This is a rough estimate of how large of a patch we will need to sample in
# EPSG:3857 in order to guarantee a large enough patch in the local CRS.
self.original_patch_size = patch_size * 2
self.original_patch_size = patch_size * 3
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a heads up @calebrob6. Not sure what changed since the last release that made this necessary for the test to pass. We should really convert this to a normal RasterDataset.

adamjstewart
adamjstewart commented Sep 30, 2023
View reviewed changes
docs/tutorials/getting_started.ipynb
@@ -189,6 +189,7 @@
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"chesapeake_root = os.path.join(tempfile.gettempdir(), \"chesapeake\")\n",
"os.makedirs(chesapeake_root, exist_ok=True)\n",
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is actually a bug in TorchGeo: #1605. Pretty minor so I don't think it's worth holding up the release for.

@adamjstewart adamjstewart merged commit 68f37da into main Sep 30, 2023
@adamjstewart adamjstewart deleted the releases/v0.5 branch September 30, 2023 21:43
@adamjstewart adamjstewart restored the releases/v0.5 branch September 30, 2023 21:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
datamodules PyTorch Lightning datamodules documentation Improvements or additions to documentation testing Continuous integration testing
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.5.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@adamjstewart