-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix an apparent x86 miscompilation on MSVC 19.38 #16742
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
DHowett
approved these changes
Feb 21, 2024
zadjii-msft
approved these changes
Feb 21, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wat
DHowett
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2024
There's an apparent miscompilation of `dynamic_bitset` on x86 with MSVC 19.38, where the following code: ```cpp dynamic_bitset<uint64_t> bits(80 * 24, 0); bits.set(0, 3 * 80, true); ``` is expected to set the first 3.75 blocks to 1 which should produce the following blocks: ``` 0xffffffffffffffff 0xffffffffffffffff 0xffffffffffffffff 0x0000ffffffffffff ``` but it actually produces: ``` 0xffffffffffffffff 0x00000000ffffffff 0xffffffffffffffff 0x0000ffffffffffff ``` The weird thing here is that this only happens if `til::bitmap` uses a `dynamic_bitset<uint64_t>`. As soon as it uses `<uint32_t>` any other instantiation of `<uint64_t>` is magically fixed. Conclusion: Use `size_t` until we know what's going on. Last known good CL version: 14.37.32822 Current broken CL version: 14.38.33130 ## Validation Steps Performed The following test completes successfully again: ```cpp til::bitmap map{ { 80, 24 } }; map.translate({ 0, 3 }, true); VERIFY_ARE_EQUAL(3u, map.runs().size()); ``` (cherry picked from commit d3ec47a) Service-Card-Id: 91885584 Service-Version: 1.20
DHowett
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2024
There's an apparent miscompilation of `dynamic_bitset` on x86 with MSVC 19.38, where the following code: ```cpp dynamic_bitset<uint64_t> bits(80 * 24, 0); bits.set(0, 3 * 80, true); ``` is expected to set the first 3.75 blocks to 1 which should produce the following blocks: ``` 0xffffffffffffffff 0xffffffffffffffff 0xffffffffffffffff 0x0000ffffffffffff ``` but it actually produces: ``` 0xffffffffffffffff 0x00000000ffffffff 0xffffffffffffffff 0x0000ffffffffffff ``` The weird thing here is that this only happens if `til::bitmap` uses a `dynamic_bitset<uint64_t>`. As soon as it uses `<uint32_t>` any other instantiation of `<uint64_t>` is magically fixed. Conclusion: Use `size_t` until we know what's going on. Last known good CL version: 14.37.32822 Current broken CL version: 14.38.33130 ## Validation Steps Performed The following test completes successfully again: ```cpp til::bitmap map{ { 80, 24 } }; map.translate({ 0, 3 }, true); VERIFY_ARE_EQUAL(3u, map.runs().size()); ``` (cherry picked from commit d3ec47a) Service-Card-Id: 91885583 Service-Version: 1.19
DHowett
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2024
There's an apparent miscompilation of `dynamic_bitset` on x86 with MSVC 19.38, where the following code: ```cpp dynamic_bitset<uint64_t> bits(80 * 24, 0); bits.set(0, 3 * 80, true); ``` is expected to set the first 3.75 blocks to 1 which should produce the following blocks: ``` 0xffffffffffffffff 0xffffffffffffffff 0xffffffffffffffff 0x0000ffffffffffff ``` but it actually produces: ``` 0xffffffffffffffff 0x00000000ffffffff 0xffffffffffffffff 0x0000ffffffffffff ``` The weird thing here is that this only happens if `til::bitmap` uses a `dynamic_bitset<uint64_t>`. As soon as it uses `<uint32_t>` any other instantiation of `<uint64_t>` is magically fixed. Conclusion: Use `size_t` until we know what's going on. Last known good CL version: 14.37.32822 Current broken CL version: 14.38.33130 ## Validation Steps Performed The following test completes successfully again: ```cpp til::bitmap map{ { 80, 24 } }; map.translate({ 0, 3 }, true); VERIFY_ARE_EQUAL(3u, map.runs().size()); ``` (cherry picked from commit d3ec47a) Service-Card-Id: 91894072 Service-Version: 1.18
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Area-Build
Issues pertaining to the build system, CI, infrastructure, meta
Issue-Bug
It either shouldn't be doing this or needs an investigation.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There's an apparent miscompilation of
dynamic_bitset
on x86 withMSVC 19.38, where the following code:
is expected to set the first 3.75 blocks to 1 which should produce
the following blocks:
but it actually produces:
The weird thing here is that this only happens if
til::bitmap
uses a
dynamic_bitset<uint64_t>
. As soon as it uses<uint32_t>
any other instantiation of
<uint64_t>
is magically fixed.Conclusion: Use
size_t
until we know what's going on.Last known good CL version: 14.37.32822
Current broken CL version: 14.38.33130
Validation Steps Performed
The following test completes successfully again: