Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add qiskit python parser #35

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 14, 2021
Merged

Add qiskit python parser #35

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 14, 2021

Conversation

atching
Copy link

@atching atching commented Sep 2, 2021

Initial commit of a parser for IBM Qiskit quantum circuits to output to json file compatible with Quantum-Viz.

Description

Adding a basic parser for Qiskit quantum circuits. Currently supports basic Qiskit circuits that contain basic gates, control gates, and measurement gates.

Testing

There is a python juypter notebook called qskit_parser_test.ipynb that acts as a testbed to continue expanding on the parser and add additional support for Qiskit objects.

Initial commit of a parser for IBM Qiskit quantum circuits to output to json file compatible with Quantum-Viz.
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 2, 2021

CLA assistant check
All CLA requirements met.

@anpaz anpaz changed the base branch from main to feature/qiskit September 7, 2021 17:14
@anpaz anpaz merged commit 4a07105 into feature/qiskit Sep 14, 2021
jond01 pushed a commit to jond01/quantum-viz.js that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2021
Initial commit of a parser for IBM Qiskit quantum circuits to output to json file compatible with Quantum-Viz.
jond01 pushed a commit to jond01/quantum-viz.js that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2021
Initial commit of a parser for IBM Qiskit quantum circuits to output to json file compatible with Quantum-Viz.
jond01 pushed a commit to jond01/quantum-viz.js that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2021
Initial commit of a parser for IBM Qiskit quantum circuits to output to json file compatible with Quantum-Viz.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants