Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Rebase & FF] [Cherry-pick] Get all the missing commits from 202302 into 202311 #205

Merged

Conversation

kenlautner
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Cherry-pick the commits from 202302 that are missing from 202311 since the creation of the release branch.

  • Impacts functionality?
    • Functionality - Does the change ultimately impact how firmware functions?
    • Examples: Add a new library, publish a new PPI, update an algorithm, ...
  • Impacts security?
    • Security - Does the change have a direct security impact on an application,
      flow, or firmware?
    • Examples: Crypto algorithm change, buffer overflow fix, parameter
      validation improvement, ...
  • Breaking change?
    • Breaking change - Will anyone consuming this change experience a break
      in build or boot behavior?
    • Examples: Add a new library class, move a module to a different repo, call
      a function in a new library class in a pre-existing module, ...
  • Includes tests?
    • Tests - Does the change include any explicit test code?
    • Examples: Unit tests, integration tests, robot tests, ...
  • Includes documentation?
    • Documentation - Does the change contain explicit documentation additions
      outside direct code modifications (and comments)?
    • Examples: Update readme file, add feature readme file, link to documentation
      on an a separate Web page, ...

How This Was Tested

CI

Integration Instructions

N/A

TaylorBeebe and others added 2 commits February 2, 2024 11:35
## Description

Linux shim currently incorrectly uses the UEFI memory attribute protocol
causing a fault. The broken shim does not have the NXCOMPAT
flag, so compatibility mode can be used to uninstall the protocol
when it is loaded. For flexibility, this patch implements the policy
configuration option to allow ARM platforms to choose not to install the
protocol.

- [x] Impacts functionality?
- **Functionality** - Does the change ultimately impact how firmware
functions?
- Examples: Add a new library, publish a new PPI, update an algorithm,
...
- [ ] Impacts security?
- **Security** - Does the change have a direct security impact on an
application,
    flow, or firmware?
  - Examples: Crypto algorithm change, buffer overflow fix, parameter
    validation improvement, ...
- [ ] Breaking change?
- **Breaking change** - Will anyone consuming this change experience a
break
    in build or boot behavior?
- Examples: Add a new library class, move a module to a different repo,
call
    a function in a new library class in a pre-existing module, ...
- [ ] Includes tests?
  - **Tests** - Does the change include any explicit test code?
  - Examples: Unit tests, integration tests, robot tests, ...
- [ ] Includes documentation?
- **Documentation** - Does the change contain explicit documentation
additions
    outside direct code modifications (and comments)?
- Examples: Update readme file, add feature readme file, link to
documentation
    on an a separate Web page, ...

## How This Was Tested

Tested on SBSA by running the DxePagingAuditTestApp with the protocol
policy set to TRUE and FALSE

## Integration Instructions

N/A
## Description

Updates edk2-pytool-extensions and edk2-pytool-library to work with the
latest commit of MU_BASECORE

For each item, place an "x" in between `[` and `]` if true. Example:
`[x]`.
_(you can also check items in the GitHub UI)_

- [ ] Impacts functionality?
- **Functionality** - Does the change ultimately impact how firmware
functions?
- Examples: Add a new library, publish a new PPI, update an algorithm,
...
- [ ] Impacts security?
- **Security** - Does the change have a direct security impact on an
application,
    flow, or firmware?
  - Examples: Crypto algorithm change, buffer overflow fix, parameter
    validation improvement, ...
- [ ] Breaking change?
- **Breaking change** - Will anyone consuming this change experience a
break
    in build or boot behavior?
- Examples: Add a new library class, move a module to a different repo,
call
    a function in a new library class in a pre-existing module, ...
- [ ] Includes tests?
  - **Tests** - Does the change include any explicit test code?
  - Examples: Unit tests, integration tests, robot tests, ...
- [ ] Includes documentation?
- **Documentation** - Does the change contain explicit documentation
additions
    outside direct code modifications (and comments)?
- Examples: Update readme file, add feature readme file, link to
documentation
    on an a separate Web page, ...

## How This Was Tested

N/A

## Integration Instructions

N/A
@kenlautner kenlautner changed the title Personal/klautner/cherry pick missing commits [Cherry-pick] Get all the missing commits from 202302 into 202311 Feb 2, 2024
@kenlautner kenlautner added the impact:non-functional Does not have a functional impact label Feb 2, 2024
@kenlautner kenlautner changed the title [Cherry-pick] Get all the missing commits from 202302 into 202311 [Rebase & FF] [Cherry-pick] Get all the missing commits from 202302 into 202311 Feb 2, 2024
@makubacki makubacki merged commit a2e21bc into release/202311 Feb 2, 2024
12 of 16 checks passed
@makubacki makubacki deleted the personal/klautner/cherry_pick_missing_commits branch February 2, 2024 21:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
impact:non-functional Does not have a functional impact
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants