Add client_protocols test to long-test job, and different golden file on Azure Linux
#6852
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
achamayou
approved these changes
Feb 21, 2025
eddyashton
changed the title
client_protocols test to long-test jobclient_protocols test to long-test job, and different golden file on Azure Linux
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2025
…le on Azure Linux (#6852)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We previously had a state where this only ran on
Releaseworkflows. This adds it to thelong-e2e-releasejob in thelong-testworkflow, so we get daily + label-triggered coverage.EDIT: Also, we have different responses on AzureLinux vs Ubuntu, so we need a second golden file.