Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support non-Llama models #964

Closed
terrytangyuan opened this issue Feb 5, 2025 · 1 comment
Closed

Support non-Llama models #964

terrytangyuan opened this issue Feb 5, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@terrytangyuan
Copy link
Collaborator

🚀 Describe the new functionality needed

We currently have a workaround to support non-Llama models through the remote vLLM provider but it would be great to support this officially.

For inline vLLM provider, this is work-in-progress: #880

Let's use this issue to discuss any proposals and technical considerations.

💡 Why is this needed? What if we don't build it?

TBA

Other thoughts

No response
@terrytangyuan terrytangyuan added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 5, 2025
@terrytangyuan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Somehow GitHub created duplicate issue so closing this one. #965

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@terrytangyuan