Slightly hack-y workaround for .DAE loading #51
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A step towards fixing JuliaRobotics/MeshCatMechanisms.jl#32
With this PR, I think .DAE MeshFile objects should work pretty well. The only issue is that it's possible for the user to try to specify a material in Julia for a .DAE MeshFile, but that specification will have no effect on what's rendered. I think the right fix is to not let users specify materials for MeshFiles anyway (as in JuliaRobotics/MeshCatMechanisms.jl#32 (comment) ), so this is OK on the meshcat javascript side.