Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

revert: Add back some upper Python version constraints in dependencies #2858

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2025

Conversation

edgarrmondragon
Copy link
Collaborator

@edgarrmondragon edgarrmondragon commented Jan 31, 2025

This reverts commit 7529cbf.

Causing issues for Poetry-managed downstream packages: https://github.com/meltano/sdk/actions/runs/13075031342/job/36484997547?pr=2857

@edgarrmondragon edgarrmondragon requested a review from a team as a code owner January 31, 2025 14:51
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request reverts a previous commit that introduced upper version constraints on some dependencies. The constraints have been removed, allowing for more flexibility in dependency management.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Removed upper Python version constraints from the 'backoff' and 'duckdb-engine' dependencies.
  • Removed the python_version<"4" constraint from the backoff dependency.
  • Removed the python_version<'4' constraint from the duckdb-engine dependency.
pyproject.toml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@edgarrmondragon edgarrmondragon self-assigned this Jan 31, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @edgarrmondragon - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Adding Python 4 version constraints seems premature since Python 4 doesn't exist yet. Consider keeping the more permissive version constraints from the previous commit unless there's a specific compatibility concern.
  • There appears to be a typo in the flake8-datetimez comment (changed to 'datetimezs')
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@edgarrmondragon edgarrmondragon changed the title revert: Remove some upper Python version constraints from dependencies (#2856)" revert: Add back some upper Python version constraints in dependencies Jan 31, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.34%. Comparing base (7529cbf) to head (edb9826).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2858   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.34%   91.34%           
=======================================
  Files          62       62           
  Lines        5209     5209           
  Branches      673      673           
=======================================
  Hits         4758     4758           
  Misses        319      319           
  Partials      132      132           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 31, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #2858 will not alter performance

Comparing revert-2856 (edb9826) with main (7529cbf)

Summary

✅ 7 untouched benchmarks

@edgarrmondragon edgarrmondragon merged commit 6dc84d6 into main Jan 31, 2025
34 checks passed
@edgarrmondragon edgarrmondragon deleted the revert-2856 branch January 31, 2025 14:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant