Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reindex file if time stamp on fasta is newer than on index? #50

Closed
deannachurch opened this issue Mar 1, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Reindex file if time stamp on fasta is newer than on index? #50

deannachurch opened this issue Mar 1, 2015 · 3 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@deannachurch
Copy link

It would be great if the index were automatically recreated if the fasta file has a new time stamp than the .fai file. I just did this test as we had to rebuild a fasta we are using and reindexing did not occur.

thanks for considering!

@mdshw5
Copy link
Owner

mdshw5 commented Mar 1, 2015

It's a good idea and something I can definitely put in the next release. Thanks for the suggestion!

On Mar 1, 2015, at 12:00 AM, Deanna Church [email protected] wrote:

It would be great if the index were automatically recreated if the fasta file has a new time stamp than the .fai file. I just did this test as we had to rebuild a fasta we are using and reindexing did not occur.

thanks for considering!


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@mdshw5 mdshw5 self-assigned this Mar 1, 2015
@mdshw5 mdshw5 modified the milestone: v0.3.6 Mar 1, 2015
@mdshw5 mdshw5 closed this as completed in ac5e68c Mar 2, 2015
@deannachurch
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the quick response! This is great.

@mdshw5
Copy link
Owner

mdshw5 commented Mar 2, 2015

After the new version passes integration tests (in an hour or so), it will be released to PyPI and you should be able to upgrade to it using pip install --upgrade pyfaidx. Please let me know if you encounter any issues, or have any other ideas!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants