-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(contract-verifier): Partial matching & automatic verification #3527
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
popzxc
force-pushed
the
popzxc-contract-verifier
branch
4 times, most recently
from
January 24, 2025 12:39
2a0083d
to
44aac98
Compare
popzxc
force-pushed
the
popzxc-contract-verifier
branch
from
January 24, 2025 13:22
44aac98
to
514900f
Compare
popzxc
requested review from
yorik,
alexandrst88,
artmakh,
hatemosphere,
onyxet,
otani88,
iluwaa,
vasyl-ivanchuk,
slowli and
perekopskiy
January 24, 2025 14:01
popzxc
commented
Jan 24, 2025
popzxc
commented
Jan 27, 2025
slowli
reviewed
Jan 27, 2025
core/lib/types/src/contract_verification/contract_identifier.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
core/lib/types/src/contract_verification/contract_identifier.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
core/lib/types/src/contract_verification/contract_identifier.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
core/lib/types/src/contract_verification/contract_identifier.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
core/lib/types/src/contract_verification/contract_identifier.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
popzxc
commented
Jan 28, 2025
perekopskiy
reviewed
Jan 28, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approach with indexing hashes is nit!
core/lib/dal/migrations/20250122102800_contract-verifier-new-schema.up.sql
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
perekopskiy
previously approved these changes
Jan 28, 2025
slowli
reviewed
Jan 28, 2025
slowli
reviewed
Jan 29, 2025
slowli
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2025
otani88
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2025
This was referenced Jan 30, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #3190
Fixes #3309
I still have to test the migration logic (want to make sure that Era mainnet data can be migrated correctly & quickly), but the PR is reviewable otherwise.
This one is much bigger than I indended it to be, sorry 🥲
zksolc
used in contract verifier tests to 1.5.10 (old one didn't haveipfs
metadata hash support).Yul
bytecode extraction).