Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

80 width broken #1456

Closed
affeldt-aist opened this issue Jan 17, 2025 · 4 comments · Fixed by #1466
Closed

80 width broken #1456

affeldt-aist opened this issue Jan 17, 2025 · 4 comments · Fixed by #1466

Comments

@affeldt-aist
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@t6s
Copy link
Member

t6s commented Jan 20, 2025

where?

@affeldt-aist
Copy link
Member Author

affeldt-aist commented Feb 7, 2025

arg, I missed my copy-paste: it was supremum_topology.v

affeldt-aist added a commit to affeldt-aist/analysis that referenced this issue Feb 7, 2025
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist mentioned this issue Feb 7, 2025
2 tasks
@t6s
Copy link
Member

t6s commented Feb 7, 2025

should we consider introducing a CI check for 80 chars per line, like https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/ does?

@affeldt-aist
Copy link
Member Author

affeldt-aist commented Feb 8, 2025

No because this is not a serious problem (so that an automated solution is just likely to introduce more maintenance problems) and since we can now use LaTeX in comments it is very likely that we will have to be more flexible about the length of lines.

This issue was really just a memo to not forget about it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants