You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
You have an object that is using a custom property of object type and it is referencing another object. If you copy the object, the copy will reference the same object as the original. This works fine and is the expected behaviour.
However, if you at the same time also copy the referenced object, the new copy with the reference keeps referencing the original reference. But, I believe that in this situation you would (almost) always want the reference to be updated to reference the copy of the referenced object.
Describe the solution you'd like
Unsure what is best: That it assumes to do the different behaviour by default, when doing a copy of objects with references to other objects ask the user what to do or a setting to toggle it. I believe option 1 is preferable as if you do copy of objects with references to objects that are also copied, the intention is to reference the new objects.
Describe alternatives you've considered
None except updating the references manually, which is what I am doing at the moment :)
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Expands on f6bf60f. Now this behavior
also applies to the following actions:
* Duplicate Layer
* Duplicate Objects
* Layer via Copy
* When the AutoMapper places objects
See issue mapeditor#3361
Expands on f6bf60f. Now this behavior
also applies to the following actions:
* Duplicate Layer
* Duplicate Objects
* Layer via Copy
* When the AutoMapper places objects
See issue mapeditor#3361
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
You have an object that is using a custom property of object type and it is referencing another object. If you copy the object, the copy will reference the same object as the original. This works fine and is the expected behaviour.
However, if you at the same time also copy the referenced object, the new copy with the reference keeps referencing the original reference. But, I believe that in this situation you would (almost) always want the reference to be updated to reference the copy of the referenced object.
Describe the solution you'd like
Unsure what is best: That it assumes to do the different behaviour by default, when doing a copy of objects with references to other objects ask the user what to do or a setting to toggle it. I believe option 1 is preferable as if you do copy of objects with references to objects that are also copied, the intention is to reference the new objects.
Describe alternatives you've considered
None except updating the references manually, which is what I am doing at the moment :)
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: