Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update LuxonisML #69

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 19, 2025
Merged

Update LuxonisML #69

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

HonzaCuhel
Copy link
Contributor

@HonzaCuhel HonzaCuhel commented Feb 19, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Purpose

Bumping luxonis-ml to 0.6.1 to ensure compatibility with the luxonis-ml logging using loguru.

Specification

  • Bump luxonis-ml==0.6.1

Dependencies & Potential Impact

  • luxonis-ml==0.6.1

@kozlov721 kozlov721 marked this pull request as ready for review February 19, 2025 15:28
@kozlov721 kozlov721 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 19, 2025 15:28
@kozlov721 kozlov721 requested review from kozlov721, klemen1999, tersekmatija and conorsim and removed request for a team February 19, 2025 15:28
@kozlov721 kozlov721 merged commit a4f481e into main Feb 19, 2025
9 of 11 checks passed
@kozlov721 kozlov721 deleted the feat/bump-luxonisml branch February 19, 2025 19:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@kozlov721 kozlov721 kozlov721 approved these changes

@klemen1999 klemen1999 Awaiting requested review from klemen1999 klemen1999 is a code owner automatically assigned from luxonis/ml-reviewers

@tersekmatija tersekmatija Awaiting requested review from tersekmatija tersekmatija is a code owner automatically assigned from luxonis/ml-reviewers

@conorsim conorsim Awaiting requested review from conorsim conorsim is a code owner automatically assigned from luxonis/ml-reviewers

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@HonzaCuhel @kozlov721